Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
One thing that is still open after TrialNerd_Beth’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. No action needed from anybody.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsTirzTom said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
TirzTom said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.