TomTeleRx said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
TomTeleRx said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from TomTeleRx — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
jason_paloalto said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.