Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Reporting back.
Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread. Writing that down for the next person who wants the interesting answer.
DeniseRN_TPA said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDeniseRN_TPA said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
DeniseRN_TPA said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. I will report back once I have actually tried it.