james_edin said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
james_edin said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
james_edin said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
PharmHunterJen said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Second this.