PeptideSynthNJ said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
PeptideSynthNJ said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
PeptideSynthNJ said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
EndoResFellow said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.