Dr.Martinez said:The intervention that works is boring and well evidenced: resistance training two to three times a week at a genuine effort, protein at 1.4 to 2.0…
Muscle fiber type changes during GLP-1-mediated weight loss, relevant to lean mass: preliminary biopsy data suggests that weight loss shifts the skeletal muscle fiber type distribution:
- Decreased Type IIx (glycolytic, fast-twitch) fibers
- Increased Type I (oxidative, slow-twitch) fibers
- Improved mitochondrial density and function
- Enhanced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake per fiber
This "metabolic remodeling" of muscle may contribute to improved insulin sensitivity independent of total lean mass changes. The muscle you keep becomes metabolically better, even if there's less of it[1].
[1] Pirkmajer S, et al. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1123456.
Following on from Dr.RaviCardio — and this may be the naive question:
Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?
LabKate said:Muscle fiber type changes during GLP-1-mediated weight loss, relevant to lean mass: preliminary biopsy data suggests that weight loss shifts the…
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale. It protects lean mass — which is the reason to do it — and it contributes modestly to the deficit, which is the reason people start and then quit when the arithmetic disappoints them. In a deep deficit, resistance work is the priority and high-volume cardio competes with recovery.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClosing the loop on my own question.
Second scan under matched conditions came back with the lean number nearly a kilogram higher than the first, so a chunk of what I panicked about was hydration. Strength numbers were up throughout.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Training does two things here and only one of them is on the scale.
Right, and protein targets should be set on a reference weight rather than current weight. Setting 1.6 g/kg on a starting weight of 130kg produces a target nobody hits on a suppressed appetite.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.