Dr.BariatricHTX said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
cory_ATX said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Dr.BariatricHTX said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
I read this differently from Dr.BariatricHTX, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.