roxy_nash said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
I read this differently from roxy_nash, on substance rather than tone. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
roxy_nash said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
roxy_nash said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Dr.SleepRoch said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.