Oct 20, 2024 at 4:21 AM#16
chris_chi24 said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Nothing to add that would improve it.
50 0paul_denver, TinaHashiRN, robert_kc and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 20, 2024 at 7:09 AM#17
TirzTom said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Last edited: Oct 20, 2024 at 8:09 AM
49 24PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 20, 2024 at 9:57 AM#18
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
48 23kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOct 20, 2024 at 12:45 PM#19
PharmHunterJen said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
47 22KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC, Dr.ObesityLA and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report