HPLC_Greg said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
HPLC_Greg said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsPedsEndoPhilly said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.
PedsEndoPhilly said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.