Dr.NateNeph said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Dr.NateNeph said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
Worth restating a point from upthread for anyone joining at this page:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultssean_dublin said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
sean_dublin said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Coming back to something from earlier in the thread, because it keeps being talked past:
Dr.ObesityLA said: ...regarding the trial evidence...