bri_stats said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
bri_stats said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Taking it to my next appointment.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMikeKY_noInsulin said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
MikeKY_noInsulin said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Coming at MikeKY_noInsulin’s question from a different direction. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.