TrialTracker_MD said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
LibrarianMeg said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsLibrarianMeg said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.