NicoleRaleigh said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
NicoleRaleigh said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
NicoleRaleigh said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.