HPLC_Greg said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
HPLC_Greg said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change. The interval was the answer, not the dose.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.Martinez said:Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change.
Mine went the same way, slower.
Dr.Martinez said:Closing this out: I held the step for six weeks rather than four and it settled without a dose change.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.