Dr.ObesityMed said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Dr.ObesityMed has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
RegAffairsDC said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Dr.ObesityMed said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.