Jul 23, 2025 at 12:28 AM#16
Dr.ObesityLA said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
48 21SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jul 25, 2025 at 7:16 AM#17
BiostatsBrad said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
That reframing is the part I needed.
Last edited: Jul 25, 2025 at 8:16 AM
49 22SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD, RetaRick_CA and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jul 27, 2025 at 2:03 PM#18
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Last edited: Jul 27, 2025 at 5:03 PM
50 23NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsJul 29, 2025 at 8:48 PM#19
jim_asheville said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
1 24TomTeleRx
Reply Quote Save Share Report