Dr.EM_Chicago said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Following on from Dr.EM_Chicago — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesGL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer
Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAdmin said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
Admin said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.